Reviewer Mohammed M Ashfaq
Ok but runs large for me. I wear 8.5 and these were at least 1/2 size too large. Returned
Reviewer George R Bausum
Got here promptly. Look and fit well. Exactly as expected.
Reviewer suew
Comfortable and lightweight shoe.
Reviewer noisy bookworm
Love the shoes, but first pair very narrow and had to be returned. My husband's feet are average to slightly narrow width. Had to get a full size larger.
Reviewer MR KELLEY JOHNSTON
However I never really enjoy them until now. I have difficulty with my legs and feet, and need to pay special attention to them. Walking, with a cane now, is not what it used to be. While I could walk 5 miles and never be concerned, I smashed my left ankle several years ago, and walking isn't that easy anymore. These shoes by Rockport not only fit right out of the box but were so comfortable I am enjoying my walks every day. I think they look great, but Rockport provides many choices. I highly recommend these shoes.
Reviewer Sarah Courtney
these feel great, the fit and design are nice. im not sure these will last long because it looks like the rubbery zig zag design is just glued on. when i got the shoe, the area around the clear window underneath was already yellowing. the sole doesnt look or feel very substantial, i wouldnt use these for anything too heavy in the gym or for a lot of hard use.
Reviewer Wynndee
Light weight, looks nice, eye catching, unusual, quick drying. look good with nice slacks, jeans or even shorts. seriously, can you ask for more!
Reviewer Piotr Grzywacz
Purchased wrong size but passed on to my brother who had never tried these before & he’s looking to buy more pairs in the future. I’ve been wearing ultra max sole by Skechers for the last year and they provide relief to my knees and my feet.
Reviewer M Arrick
Just like the pair I bought 5 years ago that are now falling apart. Love them. The old ones never blew out on the sides like my shoes tend to do with my snowshoe shaped feet.
Reviewer Lizzy Meg
I like these black shoes.
Show79-
790(Results:
1267)